[biorxiv.org] What drove nucleic acids (NA) to associate with proteins (PR) at the Origins of Life? We reason from polymer physics and the Central Dogma (CD) that the fitness value of cooperating through a division of labor – NA for replication fidelity and PR for functional fitness – is much higher than for either polymer alone.

Our model shows a Pareto Front, where NA and PR can bootstrap each other to achieve autocatalytic cooperativity towards biology.

To understand how the first cells arose from prebiotic chemistry requires making sense of what drove the association between protein molecules and RNA or DNA molecules (1, 2). Today’s living systems depend on both types of sequence-defined polymers: nucleic acids (NA) (RDNA, our shorthand for RNA and DNA) and protein molecules (PR). We call this a 2-polymer world (2PW).

Could a simpler, or earlier, form of life have been a one-polymer world (1PW)? For example the RNA World Hypothesis says that because RNA molecules can both carry information and catalyze some reactions, RNA alone might have initiated the first life (3–6). Alternatively, a Proteins World could have produced diverse functionalities prior to heritability (7–14).

RNA and proteins joined up at the Origins of Life: Persistence is the point, biorxiv.org

Astrobiology, Genomics,

Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA Space Station Payload manager/space biologist, Away Teams, Journalist, Lapsed climber, Synaesthete, Na’Vi-Jedi-Freman-Buddhist-mix, ASL, Devon Island and Everest Base Camp...

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *