[astro-ph.EP] NASA’s OSIRIS-REx mission had the objective of delivering a pristine sample from asteroid (101955) Bennu to Earth for scientific analysis–where “pristine” signifies the absence of foreign materials that could affect sample measurements.
OSIRIS-REx returned 121.6 g of regolith in September 2023; this study documents the systematic investigation of suspected contaminants encountered during the mission’s sample analysis phase. Most suspected contaminants did not originate from the spacecraft or sample curation.
Some were introduced during laboratory analyses, reinforcing the importance of procedural blanks and a strategic approach to sharing samples across laboratories with different analytical targets. Several suspected contaminants, such as phosphate and sodium fluoride particles, were ultimately identified as indigenous to Bennu, highlighting the critical role of contamination knowledge in preventing the dismissal of valuable scientific data.
We find that the returned sample meets the definition of pristine, except for an isolated 1.24% (by mass) that escaped the sample container and was thereby contaminated with spacecraft particulates. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of systematically applied contamination science and engineering practices and provide lessons and approaches to help maximize the scientific integrity of future planetary sample return missions.

1 SRC and sample canister. a. The SRC prior to spacecraft integration during ATLO (after Dworkin et al. 2017). b. The sample canister at JSC in a GN2 glovebox (after Lauretta & Connolly et al. 2024). Labels: 1, heatshield; 2, backshell; 3, sample canister lid; 4, canister air filter; 5, sample canister tortuouspath seal; 6, avionics deck; 7, canister latch; 8, capture ring; 9, TAGSAM head (32 cm diameter); 10, cut convoluted tube; and 11, SRC blanket Kapton with batting. — [astro-ph.EP]
Jason P. Dworkin, Scott A. Sandford, Nicole G. Lunning, Kevin Righter, Charles C. Lorentson, Daniel P. Glavin, Kathie L. Thomas-Keprta, Loan Le, Catherine M. Corrigan, Timothy J. McCoy, Edward B. Bierhaus, Jose C. Aponte, Angel Mojarro, Hannah L. McLain, Eric T. Parker, Denise K. Buckner, Frédéric Seguin, Radford L. Perry, Heather V. Graham, Havishk Tripathi, Pierre Haenecour, Piers Koefoed, Kun Wang, Cody Schultz, Takahiro Hiroi, Ralph E. Milliken, Simon J. Clemett, Bumsoo Kim, Christopher J. Snead, Eve L. Berger, Michael Liss, Jessica J. Barnes, Sandra Freund, Zoe A. Wilson, Ryan D. Dubisher, Natasha V. Almeida, Kimberly K. Allums, Erika H. Blumenfeld, Joseph E. Aebersold, Rachel C. Funk, Carla P. Gonzales, Julia L. Plummer, Maritza Montoya, Daniel J. Rohmer, Erika V. Rivera, Jannatul Ferdous, Gabriel C. Garcia, Melissa Rodriguez, Jose L. Ponce, Ronald Bastien, Wayland D. Connelly, Jemma Davidson, Marghaleray Amini, Vivian Lai, Dominique Weis, Josh Wimpenny, Jan Render, Gregory A. Brennecka, Yoshihiro Furukawa, Toshiki Koga, Yoshinori Takano, Hiroshi Naraoka, Yasuhiro Oba, Kenneth J. Domanik, Yao-Jen Chang, Zoe Zeszut, Thomas J. Zega, George D. Cody, Conel M. O’D. Alexander, Ian A. Franchi, Monica M. Grady, Danielle N. Simkus, Jamie E. Elsila, Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin, Allison A. Baczynski, Katherine H. Freeman, Amy E. Hofmann, Aaron S. Burton, Lindsay P. Keller, Sara S. Russell, Anjani T. Polit, Francis M. McCubbin, Harold C. Connolly Jr., Dante S. Lauretta
Comments: Body: 41 pages, 15 figures; Supplement: 12 sections, 183 pages
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.12249 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2609.12249v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12249
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Jason Dworkin
[v1] Thu, 10 Sep 2026 22:13:31 UTC (40,900 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12249
Astrobiology
