[astro-ph.EP] To date, even with JWST, it has not been possible to test for exomoons as small as the Moon. Only two reported searches for exomoons around bound planets have been attempted with JWST, both of which relied on a single JWST transit.
We suggest that the below expectation sensitivity to date is, in part, a product of the considerable intrinsic flexibility of the planet+moon transit model when confronted with a single event, and the presence of unanticipated systematic noise.
To test this, we present a search around the rocky, temperate-zone exoplanet LP 890-9c using twelve JWST transits. We find no evidence for an exomoon but exclude 0.1R⊕ moons to 95% confidence across the entire Hill region, representing by far the most sensitive search to date.
Our limits exclude analogs to many real Solar System moons, such as Europa, Rhea and Umbriel. However, we emphasize that the close-in orbit of LP 890-9c (0.04au) would make any moons larger than ∼0.1R⊕ unlikely to survive for many Gyr due to tides. Regardless, our study firmly establishes that JWST can indeed probe down to remarkably small moons.
Further, we find that even a single transit can deliver impressive limits, with the exception of one epoch that is contaminated by red noise. However, by pairing it with just one cleaner epoch, the sensitivity recovers to a level indistinguishable from any other pairing, which bodes well for a potential second JWST transit of Kepler-167e.
David Kipping
Comments: Accepted in AJ
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.05301 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2609.05301v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05301
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: David Kipping
[v1] Fri, 4 Sep 2026 15:53:59 UTC (3,548 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05301
Astrobiology
