Exoplanetology: Exoplanets & Exomoons

Statistical Reevaluation of the USP Classification Boundary: Smaller Planets Within 1 Day, Larger Period Ratios Below 2 Days

By Keith Cowing
Status Report
astro-ph.EP
February 12, 2025
Filed under , , , , , , ,
Statistical Reevaluation of the USP Classification Boundary: Smaller Planets Within 1 Day, Larger Period Ratios Below 2 Days
Terrestrial worlds — Grok via Astrobiology.com

Terrestrial worlds with P<1 day, known as ultra-short period planets (USPs), comprise a physically distinct population whose origins may be attributed to various possible formation channels within multi-planet systems.

However, the conventional 1 day boundary adopted for USPs is an arbitrary prescription, and it has yet to be evaluated whether this specific cutoff, or any alternatives, may emerge from the data with minimal assumptions. We accordingly present a statistical evaluation of the USP classification boundary for 376 multi-planet systems across Kepler, K2, and TESS.

We find that USPs are smaller in size (p=0.004) and exhibit larger period ratios with their immediate neighbors (=P2/P1; p<10−4) when compared to non-USP short-period (1

0.05) at respective orbital periods of PR=0.97+0.25−0.19 days and P=2.09+0.16−0.22 days (see Figure 3).

We verify that these results are not driven by imprecise planetary parameters, giant companions, low-mass host stars, or detection biases. Our findings provide qualitative support for pathways in which proto-USPs are detached from companions and delivered to P≲2 days via eccentric migration, while a subset of these objects near P∼1 day experience subsequent orbital decay and refractory mass loss to become USPs.

These results lend evidence towards an astrophysical basis for the 1 day USP cutoff and encourage consideration of an additional 2 day boundary within future investigations of USP architectures and evolutionary dynamics.

Orbital architectures of the 49 USP systems considered in this work. Marker sizes correspond to planetary radius, filled markers represent objects listed as confirmed within the NEA (Akeson et al. 2013), and hollow markers are associated with Kepler candidates from Lissauer et al. (2024), TESS candidates from from the revised TESS Input Catalog (Stassun et al. 2019), or the NEA’s K2 Planets and Candidates Table (Akeson et al. 2013). We observe, in accord with the literature (e.g. Rappaport et al. 2013; Steffen & Farr 2013), that USPs (red) are almost exclusively smaller than 2R and often exhibit wide orbital separations with respect to their non-USP companion planets (black). astro-ph.EP

Armaan V. Goyal, Songhu Wang

Comments: 19 pages, 4 figures, 1 table. Accepted to AJ (9 Feb 2025)
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:2502.07773 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2502.07773v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.07773
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Armaan Goyal
[v1] Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:57:03 UTC (1,108 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07773

Astrobiology

Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA Space Station Payload manager/space biologist, Away Teams, Journalist, Lapsed climber, Synaesthete, Na’Vi-Jedi-Freman-Buddhist-mix, ASL, Devon Island and Everest Base Camp veteran, (he/him) 🖖🏻