Habitable Zones & Global Climate

Habitable Zone and Atmosphere Retention Distance (HaZARD) Stellar-evolution-dependent Loss Models of Secondary Atmospheres

By Keith Cowing
Status Report
astro-ph.EP
February 22, 2025
Filed under , , , , , ,
Habitable Zone and Atmosphere Retention Distance (HaZARD) Stellar-evolution-dependent Loss Models of Secondary Atmospheres
Atmosphere retention distance for different atmospheric compositions, indicated by different colours, over time for a 1 M⊙ slowly rotating star. Above these lines, atmospheres can be retained. The green shaded area indicates the HZ. The dashed lines indicate Earth’s and Venus’s semi-major axis, denoted by their corresponding symbols. — astro-ph.EP

A major open question in exoplanet research is whether secondary atmospheres are rare around Earth-sized rocky exoplanets. In this work we determine the distance at which an Earth-sized planet orbiting a variety of stellar hosts could retain a CO2– or N2-dominated atmosphere and compare this atmospheric retention distance (ARD) with that of the liquid-water HZ.

We combined planetary atmosphere models with stellar evolution models. The atmospheric models produced by the thermochemical Kompot code allowed us to calculate the Jeans escape rates for different stellar masses, rotation rates, and ages. These loss rates allowed us to determine the closest distance a planet is likely to retain a CO2– or N2-dominated atmosphere.

Using stellar rotation evolution models, we modelled how these retention distances evolve as the X-ray and ultraviolet activity of the star evolves. We find that the overlap of the HZ and the ARD occurs earlier around slowly rotating stars. Additionally, we find that HZ planets orbiting stars with masses under 0.4 M_odot are unlikely to retain any atmosphere, due to the lower spin-down rate of these fully convective stars.

We also show that the initial rotation rate of the star can impact the likelihood of a planet retaining an atmosphere, as an initially fast-rotating star maintains high levels of short-wavelength irradiance for much longer.

The orbits of all Earth-like rocky exoplanets observed by JWST in cycles 1 and 2, including HZ planets, fall outside the ARD. Our results will have implications for future target selections of small exoplanet observing programmes with JWST or future instruments such as the Ariel space mission.

Gwenaël Van Looveren, Sudeshna Boro Saikia, Oliver Herbort, Simon Schleich, Manuel Güdel, Colin Johnstone, Kristina Kislyakova

Comments: 10 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP); Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)
Cite as: arXiv:2502.09702 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2502.09702v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.09702
Focus to learn more
Related DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452998
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Gwenaël Van Looveren
[v1] Thu, 13 Feb 2025 19:00:02 UTC (2,520 KB)
[v2] Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:43:23 UTC (2,524 KB)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09702


Astrobiology

Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA Space Station Payload manager/space biologist, Away Teams, Journalist, Lapsed climber, Synaesthete, Na’Vi-Jedi-Freman-Buddhist-mix, ASL, Devon Island and Everest Base Camp veteran, (he/him) 🖖🏻