Exoplanets, -moons, -comets

POSEIDON II: The Anti-Aligned Orbit of the Warm Neptune TOI-1710 A b

By Keith Cowing
Status Report
astro-ph.EP
April 7, 2026
Filed under , , , , , , , , , , ,
POSEIDON II: The Anti-Aligned Orbit of the Warm Neptune TOI-1710 A b
Secular evolution of the obliquities of TOI-1710 from four-body secular integrations. The semimajor axis of the intermediate companion varies across panels. The obliquity evolution of TOI-1710 A b (red) and the hypothetical intermediate companion X (blue) are shown. The companion mass is fixed at 9 MJ and the initial mutual inclination with the M-dwarf is iXB = 55 . The green region marks the 2σ constraints on the obliquity of the observed planet, with the fraction of time spent within this region indicated by fobs. Panels (a) and (c) remain within the allowed window for much less time than panel (b). In all cases, the eccentricity of planet b remains nearly the same as the initial value. — astro-ph.EP

We present an observation of the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect for the warm-Neptune system TOI-1710 obtained with the NEID spectrograph on the WIYN 3.5 m telescope.

These observations reveal that the planet orbits in the opposite direction to the stellar spin, with a sky-projected obliquity λ=179±19. Combined with information about the rotation period of the host star, we measure a true obliquity of ψ=158+11−13.

The host star has an M-dwarf companion at a separation of ∼3600 au, but this companion is too distant to be solely responsible for misaligning the warm Neptune. The host star also shows a long-term radial velocity trend, indicative of a companion at intermediate separations.

We show that such a companion can dynamically couple the warm Neptune to the distant M dwarf, enabling the transfer of inclination from the wide binary orbit to the planetary orbit.

Assuming this scenario is correct, we predict the intermediate companion is a ∼5MJ planet on a ∼15-au orbit that is nearly aligned with the transiting planet’s orbit.


Observations of TOI-1710 A. (a) NEID RVs, after subtracting a long-term linear trend (purple) along with the best-fit model including the RM effect (red curve) and the associated confidence intervals (1, 2, and 3σ, shaded red). Residuals are shown below. (b) Out-of-transit RVs versus orbital phase, along with the best-fit model (the confidence intervals are too small to be seen clearly). Residuals are shown below. (c) RV residuals versus time, after subtracting the signal of TOI-1710 A b. The red line is a linear RV trend, which is detected with 8σ confidence. (d) Transit photometry from TESS (green) along with the best-fit model (red). The darker points are time-averaged data. Residuals are shown below. (e) Deviations between measured transit times and the best-fit constant period model as a function of time. The vertical dashed line indicates the transit that was observed spectroscopically with NEID. — astro-ph.EP

Juan I. Espinoza-Retamal, Hareesh Bhaskar, Joshua N. Winn, Cristobal Petrovich, Rafael Brahm, Caleb Lammers, Guðmundur Stefánsson, Elise Koo, Andrés Jordán, Felipe I. Rojas

Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.03364 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2604.03364v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.03364
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Juan Ignacio Espinoza Retamal
[v1] Fri, 3 Apr 2026 18:00:00 UTC (2,508 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03364

Astrobiology,

Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA Space Station Payload manager/space biologist, Away Teams, Journalist, Lapsed climber, Synaesthete, Na’Vi-Jedi-Freman-Buddhist-mix, ASL, Devon Island and Everest Base Camp veteran, (he/him) 🖖🏻