Assessing Methods for Telluric Removal On Atmospheric Retrievals of High-resolution Optical Exoplanetary Transmission Spectra
Recent advancements in ultra-stable ground-based high-resolution spectrographs have propelled ground-based astronomy to the forefront of exoplanet detection and characterisation. Retrieving accurate atmospheric parameters depends on accurate modelling and removal of the telluric contamination while preserving the faint underlying exoplanet signal.
There exist many methods to model telluric contamination, whether directly modelling the Earth’s transmission spectrum via radiative transfer modelling, or using a principal component analysis (PCA)-like reconstruction to fit the time-invariant features of a spectrum. We aimed to assess the efficacy of these various telluric removal methods in preserving the underlying exoplanetary spectra.
We compared two of the most common telluric modelling and removal methods, molecfit and the PCA-like algorithm SysRem, using planetary transmission spectra injected into three high-resolution optical observations taken with ESPRESSO. These planetary signals were injected at orbital periods of P = 2 days and 12 days, resulting in differing changes in radial velocity during transit. We then retrieved various injected atmospheric model parameters in order to determine the efficacy of the telluric removal methods.
For the close-in, high velocity injected signal, we found that SysRem performed better for species that are also present in the Earth’s atmosphere across each of the datasets. As we moved to slower moving signals at larger orbital separations, for one of the three datasets, SysRem dampened the planetary H2O signal.
In contrast, the H2O signal was preserved for the telluric modelling method, molecfit. However, this behaviour was not ubiquitous across all three of the injected datasets, with another dataset showing a more precise H2O/Fe ratio when preprocessed with SysRem.
Cathal Maguire, Elyar Sedaghati, Neale P. Gibson, Alain Smette, Lorenzo Pino
Comments: 25 pages, 23 figures, appendices included. Accepted for publication in A&A
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
Cite as: arXiv:2410.19588 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2410.19588v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.19588
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Cathal Maguire
[v1] Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:30:52 UTC (28,309 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19588
Astrobiology,
