Exoplanetology: Exoplanets & Exomoons

Do All Gaps In Protoplanetary Discs Host Planets?

By Keith Cowing
Status Report
astro-ph.EP
July 27, 2023
Filed under , ,
Do All Gaps In Protoplanetary Discs Host Planets?
Comparison between the observed giant exoplanet population (gray dots) and all the simulations for the threeplanet systems. The initial values of these planets are denoted as orange for the case where the planets located in a wide configuration while brown dots denote planets located in a compact configuration, where the small numbers indicate the position of the first, second, and third planet. Purple, green and red data points symbolize the simulations for the different α, 10−3 , 3.16 · 10−4 and 10−4 respectively, whereas the coloured numbers shows the mean value and the standard deviation of the eccentricity for each case for all the simulated three- planet systems. The horizontal lines refers to the perihelion and aphelion of the planet a(1 ± e). The black dashed vertical line represents the current Radial Velocity (RV) detection limit at 5 AU. — astro-ph.EP

Following the assumption that the disc substructures observed in protoplanetary discs originate from the interaction between the disc and the forming planets embedded therein, we aim to test if these putative planets could represent the progenitors of the currently observed giant exoplanets.

We performed N-body simulations assuming initially three, four, five or seven planets. Our model includes pebble and gas accretion, migration, damping of eccentricities and inclinations, disc-planet interaction and disc evolution. We locate the planets in the positions where the gaps in protoplanetary discs have been observed and we evolve the systems for 100Myr including a few Myr of gas disc evolution, while also testing three values of α viscosity.

For planetary systems with initially three and four planets we find that most of the growing planets lie beyond the RV detection limit of 5AU and only a small fraction of them migrate into the inner region. We also find that these systems have too low final eccentricities to be in agreement with the observed giant planet population. Systems initially consisting of five or seven planets become unstable after ≈40Kyr of integration time. This clearly shows that not every gap can host a planet.

The general outcome of our simulations – too low eccentricities – is independent of the disc’s viscosity and surface density. Further observations could either confirm the existence of an undetected population of wide-orbit giants or exclude the presence of such undetected population to constrain how many planets hide in gaps even further.

Anastasia Tzouvanou, Bertram Bitsch, Gabriele Pichierri

Comments: Accepted for publication in A&A
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:2307.11172 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2307.11172v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.11172
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Anastasia Tzouvanou
[v1] Thu, 20 Jul 2023 18:09:42 UTC (4,254 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.11172
Astrobiology

Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA Space Station Payload manager/space biologist, Away Teams, Journalist, Lapsed climber, Synaesthete, Na’Vi-Jedi-Freman-Buddhist-mix, ASL, Devon Island and Everest Base Camp veteran, (he/him) 🖖🏻