TRAPPIST-1

Implications Of Atmospheric Non-detections For Trappist-1 Inner Planets on Atmospheric Retention Prospects For Outer Planets

By Keith Cowing
Press Release
astro-ph.EP
June 9, 2023
Filed under , , , , ,
Implications Of Atmospheric Non-detections For Trappist-1 Inner Planets on Atmospheric Retention Prospects For Outer Planets
All Trappist-1e model outputs consistent with an airless Trappist-1b and c, and with initial volatile endowments constrained by the airlessness of the inner planets. Since Trappist-1e orbits beyond the runaway greenhouse limit during the main sequence evolution of Trappist-1, the potential for substantial atmospheric erosion is limited, as most model runs in Monte Carlo simulations retain substantial surface volatile inventories. — astro-ph.EP

JWST secondary eclipse observations of Trappist-1b seemingly disfavor atmospheres >~1 bar since heat redistribution is expected to yield dayside emission temperature below the ~500 K observed.

Given the similar densities of Trappist-1 planets, and the theoretical potential for atmospheric erosion around late M-dwarfs, this observation might be assumed to imply substantial atmospheres are also unlikely for the outer planets. However, the processes governing atmosphere erosion and replenishment are fundamentally different for inner and outer planets. Here, an atmosphere-interior evolution model is used to show that an airless Trappist-1b (and c) only weakly constrains stellar evolution, and that the odds of outer planets e and f retaining substantial atmospheres remain largely unchanged.

This is true even if the initial volatile inventories of planets in the Trappist-1 system are highly correlated. The reason for this result is that b and c sit unambiguously interior to the runaway greenhouse limit, and so have potentially experienced ~8 Gyr of XUV-driven hydrodynamic escape; complete atmospheric erosion in this environment only weakly constrains stellar evolution and escape parameterizations.

In contrast, e and f reside within the habitable zone, and likely experienced a comparatively short steam atmosphere during Trappist-1’s pre-main sequence, and consequently complete atmospheric erosion remains unlikely across a broad swath of parameter space (e and f retain atmospheres in ~98% of model runs). Naturally, it is still possible that all Trappist-1 planets formed volatile-poor and are all airless today. But the airlessness of b (and c) does not require this, and as such, JWST transit spectroscopy of e and f remains the best near-term opportunity to characterize the atmospheres of habitable zone terrestrial planets.

Joshua Krissansen-Totton

Comments: Accepted for publication in ApJL (June 7th 2023). First submitted May 3rd, 2023. 15 pages, 6 figures, 1 table
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:2306.05397 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2306.05397v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
Submission history
From: Joshua Krissansen-Totton
[v1] Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:49:38 UTC (3,125 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05397
Astrobiology

Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA Space Station Payload manager/space biologist, Away Teams, Journalist, Lapsed climber, Synaesthete, Na’Vi-Jedi-Freman-Buddhist-mix, ASL, Devon Island and Everest Base Camp veteran, (he/him) 🖖🏻