Proxima Centauri

Dynamical Evolution and Stability Maps of the Proxima Centauri System

By Keith Cowing
Press Release
September 27, 2018
Filed under
Dynamical Evolution and Stability Maps of the Proxima Centauri System
Stability portraits of the Proxima Centauri system for the coplanar case in the (ab,eb)-plane. The initial conditions are listed in Table 1. Four panels correspond to different inclinations: a) i = 90◦, b) i = 60◦, c) i = 30◦ and d) i = 15◦. Each panel has a resolution of 50×50 for the initial data. The integration timescale for each grid point lasts 105 years. The regions in red are referred to chaotic zones, whereas blue coloured areas, near a contour value of 2, represent quasi-periodic motion of the system. For all panels the rectangles by red dashed lines denote eb < 0.35 and 0.0434 au < ab < 0.0526 au (Anglada-Escud´e et al. 2016). The red line is marked with eb = 0.4.

Proxima Centauri was recently discovered to host an Earth-mass planet of Proxima b, and a 215-day signal which is probably a potential planet c.

In this work, we investigate the dynamical evolution of the Proxima Centauri system with the full equations of motion and semi-analytical models including relativistic and tidal effects. We adopt the modified Lagrange-Laplace secular equations to study the evolution of eccentricity of Proxima b, and find that the outcomes are consistent with those from the numerical simulations. The simulations show that relativistic effects have an influence on the evolution of eccentricities of planetary orbits, whereas tidal effects primarily affects the eccentricity of Proxima b over long timescale.

Moreover, using the MEGNO (the Mean Exponential Growth factor of Nearby Orbits) technique, we place dynamical constraints on orbital parameters that result in stable or quasi-periodic motions for coplanar and non-coplanar configurations.

In the coplanar case, we find that the orbit of Proxima b is stable for the semi-major axis ranging from 0.02 au to 0.1 au and the eccentricity being less than 0.4. This is where the best-fitting parameters for Proxima b exactly fall. Additional simulations show that the robust stability of this system would favor an eccentricity of Proxima b less than 0.45 and that of Proxima c below 0.65. In the non-coplanar case, we find that mutual inclinations of two planets must be lower than 50◦ in order to provide stability. Finally, we estimate the mass of Proxima c to be 3.13 M⊕ ≤ mc ≤ 70.7 M⊕ when 1.27 M⊕ ≤ mb ≤ 1.6 M⊕, if imutual ≤ 50◦ and ∆Ω = 0 ◦.

Tong Meng, Jianghui Ji, Yao Dong
(Submitted on 21 Sep 2018)
Comments: 11 pages, 11 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:1809.08210 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:1809.08210v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
Submission history
From: Jianghui Ji
[v1] Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:04:10 GMT (997kb)

Explorers Club Fellow, ex-NASA Space Station Payload manager/space biologist, Away Teams, Journalist, Lapsed climber, Synaesthete, Na’Vi-Jedi-Freman-Buddhist-mix, ASL, Devon Island and Everest Base Camp veteran, (he/him) 🖖🏻